Financial innovations of social and solidarity economy development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2022-49-1-59-66Keywords:
additional currencies, partnership, innovation, social and solidarity economy, cooperation, reputation, additional monetary systems, ecosystems, sustainable developmentAbstract
There are a number of economic projects of social economy based on the principles of fraternity, solidarity, uniting free and equal before the law citizens, erasing the boundaries between the economic and social aspects of society. Given the growing urbanization, the breakdown of traditional ties, the spread of individualism, the dominance of material values and the atomization of society, the additional monetary systems considered in the article act as a tool that restores social ties and unites people into social networks to counteract social exclusion, and, in general, allows us to build a solidarity and horizontal society. It's an effective tool for social engineering. The concept of solidarity occupied an important place in the history of Russian thought. However, in modern Russia, in our opinion, the practices of a solidarity and social economy (SSE) could become an effective help in such areas as environmentally balanced development, revival of economic activity and recovery of the social climate in depressed regions, as well as in general the driver of the development of social capital. This article considers the aspect of financial innovation of the development of SSE - this is an increase in the means of exchange available to the population within an individual community. In particular, such as: time banks, local trade exchange systems (LETS). The research hypothesis is to analyze how the sustainability of the territory can be enhanced by using different monetary systems that act as a tool that restores social ties and unites people. The research approach is based on a comparison of the first generation of additional currencies, the device of the second generation: time banks and the third generation of complementary currencies, which thus contributes to an understanding of the growth of the social and solidarity economy at present. As a result of the study, it was proved that the additional currencies of the fourth generation not only form (promote) social ties between people, but are also used in the implementation of social and environmental programs. Note that the results of the study open a new theoretical direction in the study of problems of sustainable development.
Downloads
References
Кроль М. 2020. Дополнительные денежные системы. Режим доступа: https://www.cloudwatcher.ru. (дата обращения: 15 февраля 2022)
Мировая экономика. 2019. Щербанин Ю.А., Зенкина Е.В., Толмачев П.И., Грибанич В.М., Дрыночкин А.В., Королев Е.В., Кутовой В.М., Логинов Б.Б. Москва: ООО "Издательство "Юнити-Дана", 503 с.
Мировая экономика и международные экономические отношения. 2021. Абрамова А.В., Алёшин Д.А., Апанович М.Ю., Арапова Е.Я., Булатов А.С., Волков А.М., Габарта А.А., Галищева Н.В., Горбанев В.А., Дегтерева Е.А., Дегтярева О.И., Елагин Д.П., Жданов С.В., Завьялова Е.Б., Зарицкий Б.Е., Зенкина Е.В., Иванова Н.А., Исаченко Т.М., Кавешников Н.Ю., Калашников Д.Б. и др. Учебник. Москва, Сер. Бакалавриат (4-е издание, переработанное и дополненное).
Bank for International Settlements. 2021. Global liquidity: selected indicators, BIS website, http://www.bis.org/statistics/gli.htm
EASPD (European Association of Service Providers with Persons with Disabilities). 2020. COVID-19: how social enterprises are fighting back! https://www.easpd.eu/en/content/covid-19-how-social-enterprises-are-fighting-back.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (n.d.). 2020. What is the circular economy? https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/what-is-the-circular-economy
Биглова Г.Ф. 2018. Социализация экономики: от проблемы собственности до гуманизации труда. Финансовый журнал, 3: 121–130.
Зенкина Е.В. 2020. В поисках новых инструментов стимулирования экономического развития. Инновации и инвестиции, 5: 38–41.
Зенкина Е.В. 2017. Новые контуры финансового рынка XXI века. Вопросы новой экономики, 4(44): 37–42.
Малинина Е.В. 2009. Эффективность национальной политики в условиях финансовой глобализации: валютный аспект. Вестник РГГУ. Серия: Экономика. Управление. Право, 3: 228–236.
Aldridge Theresa J., Patterson Alan. 2002. LETS Get Real: Constraints on the Development of Local Exchange Trading Schemes. Area, 34(4): 370–381.
Bastida, M.; Vaquero, A.; Cancelo, M.; Olveira, A. 2020. Fostering the Sustainable Development Goals from an Ecosystem Conducive to the SE: The Galician’s Case. Sustainability, 12: 500.
Bernard Lietaer. 2004. Urges the Growth of New Currency. Bank Technology News, Jul. 1st, available at: accessmylibrary.com. (accessed: 10.02.2022).
Bernard Lietaer. 2001. The Future of Money. Random House, 2001.
Chaves R.; Monzón J.L. 2018. The social economy facing emerging economic concepts: Social innovation, social responsibility, collaborative economy, social enterprises and solidarity economy. CIRIEC España Rev. Econ. Pública Soc. Coop., 93: 5–50.
Gallego-Bono J.R.; Chaves-Avila R. 2019. How to boost clusters and regional change through cooperative social innovation. Econ. Res. Ekon. Istraživanja. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1696694
Itçaina X.; Richez-Battesti N. 2018. (Eds.), Social and Solidarity-based Economy and Territory. In From Embeddedness to Co-Construction; CIRIEC and Peter Lang Publishers: Brussels, Belgium.
Jeffrey Jacob, Brinkerhoff Merlin, Jovic Emily, Wheatley Gerald. 2002. The Social and Cultural Capital of Community Currency. An Ithaca HOURS Case Study Survey». International Journal of Community Currency Research, 8: 43–55.
Lee S. 2020. Role of social and solidarity economy in localizing the sustainable development goals. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 27: 65–71.
Mendoza J., Roman C., Hernandez M. 2019. Social Economy and Public Procurement: The reserved procurements tool. CIRIEC España Rev. Econ. Pública Soc. Coop., 97: 213–244.
Pape U., Brandsen T., Pahl J.B., Pieli´nski B., Baturina D., Brookes N., Chaves-Avila R., Rentzsch C., Savall T. 2020. Changing policy environments in Europe and the resilience of the third sector. VOLUNTAS Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ., 31: 238–249.
Salathé-Beaulieu G., Bouchard M.J., Mendell M. 2019. Sustainable Development Impact Indicators for Social and Solidarity Economy: State of the Art; UNRISD Working Paper 2019-4; United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD): Geneva, Switzerland.
Seyfang Gill. 2002. Tackling social exclusion with community currencies: learning from LETS to Time Banks. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 6(3): 1–11.
Spear R.; Defourny J.; Laville J.L. 2018. (Eds.) Tackling Social Exclusion in Europe: The Contribution of the Social Economy; Routledge: London, UK.
Stryabkova E.A., Glotova A.S., Titova I.N., Lyshchikova J.V., Chistnikova I.V. 2018. Modeling and forecasting of socio-economic development of the region. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5: 404–410.
Stryabkova E.A., Vladyka M.V., Lyshchikova J.V., Kochergin M.A., Rzayev A.Y. 2021. Smart specialization as a comprehensive territorial and sectoral approach to determining regional development priorities. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 5(53): 1353–1370.
Abstract views: 149
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 ECONOMICS. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.