The analyze method of functional requirements change dynamics for multifunctional cyber-physical systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2021-48-3-528-542Keywords:
multifunctional system, reconfiguration, requirements change, system analysis, function, cyber-physical systemsAbstract
The development of cyber-physical systems led to a significant increase in their structural and functional complexity and make them multifunctional. Decision support for the development management of such systems requires taking into account the dynamics of requirements change. There is, hence, an urgent need to develop mechanisms in order to analyze the requirements changes of multifunctional systems. The analysis of goal-oriented methods for requirements specification led to describe the model of the requirements system in the form of adaptability requirement hierarchy. This model allow to aggregate requirements dynamics and interlinks. The analysis of requirements change process allowed to determinate the basic factors and suggested to account the value of change in the management. The study introduces new indicator – “dynamics of requirements change” for the system analysis of multifunctional cyber-physical system. It presented as a ratio of the relative value requirements change sum to the period of changes. New estimation method based on qualitymetric approach allow to account the value of dynamics of requirements change indicator with the traceability and importance of individual changes as a form of quality tree. The proposed method of evaluating the indicator requirements changes allows to determine the external dynamics of the managed multifunctional system. The application of new indicator is an indirect assessment of changes in the multifunctional reconfigurable systems environment as a form of system analysis. The illustration indicators values for some complex system have relative large (more then 0,2 by year) dynamics.
Downloads
References
Азгальдов Г.Г., Райхман Э.П. 1972. О Квалиметрии. Издательство стандартов. 172 с.
Гришаков В.Г., Логинов И.В. 2016. Управление динамической реконфигурацией
ИТ-инфраструктуры в меняющихся условиях. Информационные системы и технологии, 3(95): 13–22.
Дементьев Д.Н., Гришаков В.Г., Логинов И.В., Христенко Д.В. 2015. Сервис-ориентированная модель телекоммуникационной системы. Инфокоммуникационные технологии, 13(1): 51–58.
Кулямин В.В., Пакулин Н.В., Петренко О.Л., Сортов А.А., Хорошилов А.В. 2013. Формализация требований на практике. ИСП РАН, препринт 13. 70 c.
Липко Ю.Ю. 2014. Алгоритм формализации требований при разработке информационных систем. Известия ЮФУ. Технические науки. 6(155): 153–158.
Логинов И.В. 2017. Оптимизация портфеля ИТ-услуг путем многопараметрической оценки пригодности на основе адаптивных технологических моделей. Системы управления и информационные технологии. 2 (68): 43–48.
Сулейманова А.М., Яковлев Н.Н. 2010. Семантическое и многоаспектное моделирование в управлении требованиями к математическому и программному обеспечению. Вестник Башкирского университета. 15(3): 553–556.
Akbar M. A., Mahmood S., Huang Zh., Khan A.A., Shameem M. 2020. Readiness model for requirements change management in global software development. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. 32:e2264. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2264.
Anang Yu, Takahashi M., Watanabe Y. 2016. A Method for Software Requirement Volatility Analysis Using QFD. Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly CSIMQ, Issue8, September/October2016, Pages 1–14. Published online by RTU Press, https://csimq-journals.rtu.lvhttps://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2016-8.01ISSN: 2255-9922 online.
Bokhari M.U., Siddiqui S.T. 2011. Metrics for requirements engineering and automated requirements tools. In Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Computing for Nation Development (INDIACOM). New Delhi: Bharati Vidyapeeth’s Institute of Computer Applications and Management. March 10–11. 13 p.
Chua. B., Verner J. 2010. Examining Requirements Change Rework Effort: A Study. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications. 1(3). p. 48. doi:10.5121/ijsea.2010.1304.
Costello R.J., Dar-Biau L. 1995. Metrics for requirements engineering. Journal of Systems and Software, Vol 29, Issue 1, pp. 39-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(94)00127-9.
Dasanayake S., Aaramaa S., Markkula J., Oivo M. 2019. Impact of requirements volatility on software architecture: How do software teams keep up with ever‐changing requirements? Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. 31:e2160. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2160.
Dowdeswell B., Sinha R., Haemmerle E. 2016. TORUS: Tracing Complex Requirements for Large Cyber-Physical Systems. 2016 21st International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, pp. 23-32, doi: 10.1109/ICECCS.2016.013.
Ebad Sh.A. 2017. Towards Measuring Software Requirements Volatility: A Retrospective Analysis. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science. 30(2): 99-116. june 2017. ISSN 0127-9084. Available at: <https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/MJCS/article/view/7033>. Date accessed: 04 may 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.22452/mjcs.vol30no2.3.
Feather M.S., Fickas S., Lamsweerde A.V., Ponsard C. 1998. Reconciling system requirements and runtime behavior. Proceedings Ninth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design,
pp. 50-59. doi: 10.1109/IWSSD.1998.667919.
Ghanavati S., Amyot D., Rifaut A. 2014. Legal goal-oriented requirement language (legal GRL) for modeling regulations. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering (MiSE 2014). Association for Computing Machinery. New York, NY, USA, 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2593770.2593780.
Horkoff J., Aydemir F.B., Cardoso E., Li T., Maté A., Paja E., Salnitri M., Mylopoulos J., Giorgini P. 2016. Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Map. 2016 IEEE
th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 106–115, doi: 10.1109/RE.2016.41.
Jayatilleke S., Lai R. 2021. A method of assessing rework for implementing software requirements changes. Computer Science and Information Systems, 18(1): 129–154. https://doi.org/10.2298/ CSIS200221032J.
Jayatilleke Sh., Lai R. 2018. A Systematic Review of Requirements Change Management. Information and Software Technology. 93: 163–185. ISSN 0950-5849. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.infsof.2017.09.004.
Jayatilleke Sh., Lai R., Reed K. 2017. Managing software requirements changes through change specification and classification. Computer Science and Information Systems, 15(2): 321–346. https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS161130041J.
Jayatilleke S., Lai R., Reed K. 2018. A method of requirements change analysis. Requirements Eng. Vol 23, pp. 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-017-0277-7.
Kassou M., Kjiri L. 2012. A Goal Question Metric Approach for Evaluating Security in a Service Oriented Architecture Context. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol 9, Issue 4, No 1,
pp. 238-249. ISSN (Online): 1694-0814. https://www.ijcsi.org/papers/IJCSI-9-4-1-238-249.pdf.
Loconsole A. 2008. A Correlational Study on Four Size Measures as Predictors of Requirements Volatility. 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE).
–27 June 2008. Pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.18.
Loconsole A., Borstler J. An industrial case study on requirements volatility measures. 2005. 12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 8. doi: 10.1109/APSEC.2005.38.
Loucopoulos P., Kavakli E., Chechina N. 2019. Requirements Engineering for Cyber Physical Production Systems. International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. CAiSE 2019. pp. 276-291, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11483. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21290-2_18.
Madampe K., Hoda R., Grundy J. 2020. A Multi-dimensional Study of Requirements Changes in Agile Software Development Projects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012, 2020-12-07, doi: arxiv-2012.03423.
McGee S., Greer D. Software requirements change taxonomy: Evaluation by case study. 2011. 2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference, Trento, Italy, pp. 25–34, doi:10.1109/RE.2011.6051641.
Sanaa H., Afifi W. A., Ramadan D. N. 2016. The Goal Questions Metrics for Agile Business Intelligence. Egyptian Computer Science Journal, Vol. 40, no 2, May 2016, pp. 24-42. ISSN-1110-2586. http://ecsjournal.org/Archive/Volume40/Issue2/3.pdf.
Abstract views: 127
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 ECONOMICS. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
