The Ecosystem Approach in the Context of Digitalization: The Role of the State and Spatial Disproportions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2025-52-4-773-784Keywords:
fourth industrial revolution, digitalization, ecosystem, innovation, technology, mesoeconomics, competition, businessAbstract
The article considers the problems of formation and development of regional ecosystems in terms of digitalization. It is noted that in the context of the complex socio-economic and political situation Russia faces today, the problem of ensuring the competitiveness of the national economy and the economies of the regions is of particular importance. One of the possible solutions to this difficult task is the development of regional ecosystems, which, in turn, involves an active use of digital technologies. The emergence and development of the digital economy has led to fundamental changes in the ways of doing business and organizing the daily life of the population. One of the main problems in the management of socio-ecological systems is the difficulty of accurately predicting possible trends in the development of the situation. Regional economic systems are changing much faster than models for predicting the situation development can be re-modeled and calculated. The most important factor in the development of innovative ecosystems at the meso level is the effective interaction of all actors in these processes: business, universities, research organizations, governing bodies. For many reasons, the processes of economic and technological development in Russia are largely determined by the participation of the state, which often acted not only as a coordinator, but also as an organizer of these processes. This forces the Russian state to regulate the process of digital development of ecosystems for a fairly long period of time.
Downloads
References
Список источников
Ростех и ОАК: провал программы импортозамещения.https://specreporter.com/2024/12/28/rosteh-i-oak-proval-programmy-importozameshheniya (дата обращения 07.04.2025).
Сивашенков А. Гибель титанов. Почему Airbus прекращает выпуск А380.https://www.forbes.ru/biznes/372365-gibel-titanov-pochemu-airbus-prekrashchaet-vypusk-a380.(дата обращения 07.04.2025).
Шваб К. Четвертая промышленная революция. М.: «Эксмо». 2016, 138 с.
Шухманина О. Крупнейшие российские цифровые экосистемы в 2024-2025 годах: рынок замедляет рост, лидеры сохраняют позиции.https://abireg.ru/newsitem/106771/(дата обращения 07.04.2025).
Список литературы
Акбердина В.В., Василенко Е.В. 2023. Базовые стратегии поведения промышленности как участника региональных инновационных экосистем. AlterEconomics, 20(3): 548–569. DOI: 10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-3.4
Кульба В.В., Меденников В.И. 2023. Научная региональная цифровая экосистема на основе предметной идентификации экосистем. Шестнадцатая международная конференция «Управление развитием крупномасштабных систем» (MLSD’2023) (Москва, 26–28 сентября 2023 г.). М.: Институт проблем управления им. В.А. Трапезникова РАН: 68–78. DOI: 10.25728/mlsd.2023.0068.
Лаптев В.А. 2022. Экосистема цифровой экономики. Общенациональный интерактивный энциклопедический портал «Знания», 8. DOI:10.54972/00000042_2022_8_42.
Овчинникова А.В., Зимин С.Д. 2021. Рождение концепции предпринимательских экосистем и ее эволюция. Экономика, предпринимательство и право, 11(6): 1497–1514. DOI: 10.18334/epp.11.6.112307.
Писарев И.В., Бывшев В.И., Пантелеева И.А., Парфентьева К.В. 2022. Исследование готовности регионов России к цифровой трансформации. π-Economy, 15(2): 22–37. DOI: 10.18721/JE.15202.
Хоменко Е.Б., Ватутина Л.А., Злобина Е.Ю. 2022. Современные тенденции цифровой трансформации промышленных предприятий. Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия Экономика и право, 32(4): 676–682. DOI: 10.35634/2412-9593-2022-32-4-676-682.
Acs Z.J., Stam E., Audretsch D.B., O’Connor A. 2017. The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1): 1–10.
Adner R, Kapoor R. 2010. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3): 306–333.
Adner R. 2017. Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1): 39–58.
Hawley A.H. 1986. Human ecology: a theoretical essay. University of Chicago Press, London, 186 р.
Markusen А. 1999. Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies. Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, 33(9): 869–884. DOI: 10.1080/00343409950075506.
Moore J.F. 1993. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3): 75–86.
Porter M.E. 1985. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York. Free Press, 557 р.
Scott A.J. 2008. A perspective of economic geography. NY: Routledge, 21 р.
Watanabe C., Yu Т., Neittaanmäki P.A. 2018. New Paradox of the Digital Economy ‒ Structural Sources of the Limitation of GDP Statistics. Technology in Society, 55: 9–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.05.004
References
Akberdina V.V., Vasilenko E.V. 2023. Basic strategies of industry behavior as a participant in regional innovation ecosystems. AlterEconomics, 20(3): 548–569 DOI: 10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-3.4 (in Russian).
Kulba V.V., Medennikov V.I. 2023. Scientific regional digital ecosystem based on subject identification of ecosystems. Sixteenth international conference "Management of Large-Scale Systems Development" (MLSD'2023) (Moscow, September 26-28, 2023). Moscow: V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences: 68–78. DOI: 10.25728/mlsd.2023.0068 (in Russian).
Laptev V.A. 2022. Ecosystem of the digital economy. National interactive encyclopedic portal “Knowledge”, 8. DOI: 10.54972/00000042_2022_8_42 (in Russian).
Ovchinnikova A.V., Zimin S.D. 2021. The birth of the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems and its evolution. Economy, entrepreneurship and law, 11(6): 1497–1514. DOI 10.18334/epp.11.6.112307 (in Russian).
Pisarev I.V., Byvshev V.I., Panteleeva I.A., Parfentieva K.V. 2022. Study of the readiness of Russian regions for digital transformation. π-Economy, 15(2): 22–37. DOI: 10.18721/JE.15202 (in Russian).
Khomenko E.B., Vatutina L.A., Zlobina E.Yu. 2022/ Modern trends in the digital transformation of industrial enterprises. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law, 32(4): 676–682. DOI: 10.35634/2412-9593-2022-32-4-676-682 (in Russian).
Acs Z.J., Stam E., Audretsch D.B., O’Connor A. 2017. The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1): 1–10.
Adner R, Kapoor R. 2010. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3): 306–333.
Adner R. 2017. Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1): 39–58.
Hawley A.H. 1986. Human ecology: a theoretical essay. University of Chicago Press, London, 186 р.
Markusen А. 1999. Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Criti-cal Regional Studies. Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, 33(9): 869–884. DOI: 10.1080/00343409950075506.
Moore J.F. 1993. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3): 75–86.
Porter M.E. 1985. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York. Free Press, 557 р.
Scott A.J. 2008. A perspective of economic geography. NY: Routledge, 21 р.
Watanabe C., Yu Т., Neittaanmäki P.A. 2018. New Paradox of the Digital Economy ‒ Structural Sources of the Limitation of GDP Statistics. Technology in Society, 55: 9–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.05.004
Abstract views: 10
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Economics. Information Technologies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
