Automating the Processing of Legal Documents on the Example of Legal Support for Publishing: Tasks and Promising Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2022-49-2-394-402Keywords:
jurimetrics, legal cybernetics, computational law, legal tech, publishing, legal activities automationAbstract
The activity of subjects in the legal field requires knowledge of the requirements of public acts and their regular changes. Continuous development of the current legal framework requires the introduction of automation tools to support the legal activities of legal entities and individuals. Digital transformation of document management provides an opportunity to implement artificial intelligence methods for automatic batch processing of texts, in order to increase the speed of verification of legal documents for compliance with current laws and regulations. According to the results of the study, an analysis of the history of development of technologies for automating legal activities was carried out and key prospective information technologies were identified: automatic text processing, machine translation, data mining, data visualization. The classification of existing types of normative legal documents, methods of their analysis and approaches to the automation of legal activity, as well as existing information-analytical computer systems for legal support of document flow were proposed.
Downloads
References
Computational law MIT URL: https://law.mit.edu/ (дата обращения 30.03.2022).
The legal perspective on artificial intelligence: An evolving relationship URL: https://www.businessgoing.digital/the-legal-perspective-on-artificial-intelligence-an-evolving-relationship/ (дата обращения 20.04.2022).
Васильев В.В., Грачева А.В., Родионов А.И., Блеканов И.С. 2019. Графовые методы выявления семантически значимых текстов судебных решений. Процессы управления и устойчивость, 6(1): 234–239.
Грачева А.В. 2019. От правовой информатики до Legal Tech: история развития в России и за рубежом. ЗАКОН, (5), 56–65.
Наумов В.Б., Бутримович Я.В., Котов А.А. 2020. Обеспечение качества правового регулирования экспериментальных правовых режимов. Российское право: образование, практика, наука. 3(117). 40–49.
Трофимов Е.В., Мецкер О.Г. 2020. Использование компьютерных методов и систем в изучении права, интеллектуальном анализе и моделировании правовой деятельности: систематический обзор. Труды ИСП РАН. № 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ispolzovanie-kompyuternyh-metodov-i-sistem-v-izuchenii-prava-intellektualnom-analize-i-modelirovanii-pravovoy-deyatelnosti (дата обращения: 05.05.2022).
Atik, J., Jeutner, V., Quantum Computing and Computational Law (March 21, 2021). Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2019-38, Jeffery Atik & Valentin Jeutner (2021): Quantum computing and computational law, Law, Innovation and Technology, DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2021.1977216, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3490930 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3490930.
Franken H., 1982. Systeemtheorie en Rechtswetenschap. Preadvies voor de Vereniging voor Wijsbegeerte en het Recht Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Rechtsfilosofie en Rechtstheorie.
Franken H., 1983."Jurist en computer: theoretische achtergronden", in A.H. de Wild and B. Eilders (eds.), Jurist en computer (Deventer: Kluwer).
Genesereth, M.R. 2021. “What Is Computational Law?”, Complaw Corner, Codex: The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics.
Ilková V., Ilka A., 2016. Legal Cybernetics: An Educational Perspective, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(6):328.
Jon Bing Computers and law: some beginnings P. 15–17 https://www.jus.uio.no/ifp/om/organisasjon/seri/forskning/publikasjoner/yulex/Yulex_2006.pdf (дата обращения 20.04.2022).
Kerimov D.A. Сybernetics and soviet jurisprudence. URL: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2948&context=lcp (дата обращения 15.04.2022).
Loevinger, Lee, 1799. "Jurimetrics: Science and Prediction in the Field of Law" (1961). Minnesota Law Review. P.261. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1799 (дата обращения 11.04.2022).
Loevinger, Lee, "Jurimetrics--The Next Step Forward" (1949). Minnesota Law Review. 1796. URL: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1796 (дата обращения 06.04.2022).
Metsker O., Trofimov E., Grechishcheva S. 2020. Natural language processing of Russian court decisions for digital indicators mapping for oversight process control efficiency: Disobeying a po-lice officer case. In Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (EGOSE’2019), pp. 295–307.
Abstract views: 189
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 ECONOMICS. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
