Investigation of the Phenomenon of Spatial Proximity of Regions of the Russian Federation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2022-49-2-209-216Keywords:
spatial proximity, non-spatial proximity, knowledge, capital, technology flows, interregional interaction, network structuresAbstract
The article examines foreign and Russian approaches to the study of the spatial and non-spatial proximity of regions, which are prerequisites for creating interregional interaction, knowledge, capital, technology flows, as well as effective economic growth of Russian regions. A methodical approach has been applied to the calculation and visualization of the spatial/geographical proximity of the subjects of the Russian Federation to the Belgorod region. The typology of the spatial proximity of the subjects of the Russian Federation with respect to the Belgorod region, obtained in the course of calculations, does not fully reveal all the potential channels for the flow of knowledge, capital, and technology. Various types of non-spatial proximity are considered and the most favorable prerequisites for enhancing inter-regional cooperation, which, in our opinion, can arise on the basis of the principle of complementarity, are identified. Determining the significance and degree of influence of various types of proximity showed that spatial proximity in conjunction with non-spatial one gives impetus to the creation of cluster structures, forms network interaction and other integration forms of regional interaction.
Acknowledgements
The research was carried out within the framework of the state assignment FZWG-2020-0016 (0624-2020-0016), the topic of the project «Fundamental foundations of global territorial and industry specialization in the context of digitalization and technology convergence".
Downloads
References
Стратегия пространственного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года. (с изменениями на 16 декабря 2021 года) URL: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/552378463/ (дата обращения: 25 мая 2022).
Березиков С.А., Цукерман В.А. 2015. Теоретико-методологические подходы к исследованию процесса технологической трансформации территорий Арктики минерально-сырьевой направленности. Экономика в промышленности, 2: 47–52.
Канева М.А., Унтура Г.А., Морошкина О.Н. 2020. Феномен структурно-технологической близости и перетоки знаний в регионах России. Экономика региона, 16 (4): 1254-1271.
Клейнер Г.Б., Рыбачук М.А. 2019. Системная сбалансированность экономики России. Региональный разрез. Экономика региона, 15 (2): 309–323.
Пешина Э.В. Авдеев П.А. 2013. Формирование валовой добавленной стоимости высокотехнологичной и наукоемкой продукции (товаров, услуг). Известия УрГЭУ, 6 (50): 46 –56.
Татаркин А.И. 2016. Региональная направленность экономической политики Российской Федерации как института пространственного обустройства территорий. Экономика региона, 1: 9–27.
Унтура Г.А., Канева М.А., Заболотский А.А. 2019. Влияние науки, инноваций и концентрации производства на экономический рост регионов России. Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность, 12 (15): 2327–2343.
Aldieri L., Kotsemir M.N., Vinci C.P. 2017. Knowledge spillover effects: empirical evidence from Russian regions. Quality and Quantity, 52: 2111–2132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0624-2.
Boschma R. 2015. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39: 61–74.
Caragliu А., Nijkamp P. 2015. Space and knowledge spillovers in European regions: the impact of different forms of proximity on spatial knowledge diffusion. Journal of Economic Geography, 16 (3): 1–26.
Crescenzi R. 2013. Changes in economic geography theory and dynamics of technological change. Handbook of Regional Science. Eds. M. M. Fischer, P. Nijkamp. Berlin: Springer-Verlag: 649–666.
Faggian, A. & McCann, P. 2009. Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regions. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33: 317–333.
Kaneva M., Untura G. 2017. Innovation indicators and regional growth in Russia // Economic Change and Restructuring, 50 (2): 13–159.
Kaneva M., Untura G. 2017. The impact of R&D and knowledge spillovers on the economic growth of Russian regions. Growth and Change, 50: 301–334.
Los B. 2018. The empirical performance of a new inter-industry technology spillover measure P. P. Saviotti, B. Nooteboom еds. Technology and knowledge; from the firm to innovation systems. London: Edward Elgar Publishing: 118–151.
Lyshchikova J.V. 2022. Interregional interaction in the conditions of digitalization: analysis of programmes of the European Union (EU) for supporting cooperation across borders in the context of the proximity theory development. Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual, 1(34): 98-116.
Marrocu E., Paci R., Usai S. 2013. Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: what lessons for innovation policy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80: 1484–1498.
Moreno-Serrano, R., Paci, R. & Usai, S. 2005. Geographical and sectoral clusters of innovation in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 39: 715–739.
Schurmann, C. & Talaat, A. 2000. Towards a European peripherally index. Report for General Directorate XVI Regional Policy of the European Commission. Dortmund: IRPUD, 48.
Abstract views: 115
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 ECONOMICS. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
