Principles and Models for the Development of Equidistant Digital Infrastructure in the Agro-Industrial Complex

the research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 24-28-01117 "Development of an ecosystem model of the functioning of agricultural credit", https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-01117/

Authors

  • Dmitry A. Korobeynikov Volgograd State Agrarian University
  • Ivan S. Korabelnikov Volgograd State Agrarian University
  • Victoria K. Telekabel Volgograd State Agrarian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2026-53-1-65-73

Keywords:

government information systems, digital ecosystems, government support, public administration, digital platforms

Abstract

The digitalization and platformization of public administration in the agro-industrial complex highlight the need for research into the development of a publicly accessible and unified digital infrastructure. The authors examine the existing state information systems in the sector and formulate principles for their integration, proposing two alternative models for creating an equidistant digital infrastructure: 1) development of an information system of digital services in agriculture, created by the Russian Ministry of Agriculture; 2) the formation of a unified ecosystem of state digital services in the agro-industrial complex. The first model envisions the use of a departmental information system of digital services to ensure seamless user access to various GIS and the proactive provision of state support measures. The second model envisions the development of a multi-platform digital ecosystem for the automation of public administration functions, as well as interaction with financial and corporate digital platforms and services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dmitry A. Korobeynikov, Volgograd State Agrarian University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Security, Volgograd, Russia
E-mail: korobeinikov77@yandex.ru

Ivan S. Korabelnikov, Volgograd State Agrarian University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Security, Volgograd, Russia

Victoria K. Telekabel, Volgograd State Agrarian University

Student, Faculty of Applied Economics and Management, Volgograd, Russia

References

Список источников

Национальная цифровая инфраструктура финансового рынка: доклад для общественных консультаций Банка России. URL: https://www.cbr.ru/press/event/?id=27965 (дата обращения: 14 октября 2025).

Список литературы

Езангина И.А., Маловичко А.Е., Хрысева А.А. 2023. Инновационная экосистема как новая форма организационной целостности и механизм финансирования и воспроизводства инноваций. Финансы: теория и практика, 27 (3): 17–32.

Коробейников Д.А. 2024. Развитие экосистемных форм реализации кредитных отношений в АПК. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: Экономика, 59 (2): 95–111.

Коробейникова O.M., Очеретяная Д.В., Петерс И.А., Шалдохина С.Ю. 2022. Цифровые экосистемы для агробизнеса. Аграрная Россия, 6: 40–47.

Меденников В.И. 2021. Цифровая онтологическая интеграция базовых цифровых платформ в экосистеме АПК. Управление рисками в АПК, 38: 7–20.

Раменская Л.А. 2020. Применение концепции экосистем в экономико-управленческих исследованиях. Управленец, 11 (4): 16–28.

Степнов И.М., Ковальчук Ю.А. 2023. Финансы бизнес-экосистем: современная повестка и вызовы. Финансы: теория и практика, 27 (6): 89–100.

Шаститко А.Е., Курдин А.А., Филиппова И.Н. 2023. Мезоинституты для цифровых экосистем. Вопросы экономики, 2: 61–82.

Carliss Y. 2020. Baldwin Ecosystems and Complementarities. Design Rules, How Technology Shapes Organizations. Working Paper, 5 (2): 21–33.

Foss N., Schmidt J., Teece D. 2022. Ecosystem Leadership as a Dynamic Capability. Long Range Planning, 56 (1): 102270.

Gawer A. 2021. Digital platforms and ecosystems: remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Innovation, 24: 1–15.

Jacobides M., Lianos I. 2021. Regulating platforms and ecosystems: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(1).

Koch M., Krohmer D., Naab M., Rost D., Trapp M. 2022. A matter of definition: Criteria for digital ecosystems. Digit. Bus, 2: 100027.

Korobeynikova O., Korobeynikov D., Popova L., Chekrygina T., Melikhov V. 2023. Russian agribusiness and digital ecosystems: ways of interaction. XV International Scientific Conference «INTERAGROMASH 2022»: Proceedings, volume 1, Rostovon-Don, May 25–27, 2022. Cham: Springer: 1205–1215.

Kretschmer T., Leiponen A., Schilling M., Vasudeva G. 2020. Platform ecosystems as meta‐organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 43 (5): 1–20.

Rietveld J., Ploog J.N., Nieborg D.B. 2020. Coevolution of platform dominance and governance strategies: Effects on complementor performance outcomes. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6 (3): 488–513.

Rietveld J., Schilling M.A. 2021. Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. Journal of Management, 47 (6): 1528–1563.

Silva L., Gomes L., Faria A., Borini F. 2024. Innovation processes in ecosystem settings: An integrative framework and future directions. Technovation, 132.

Thomas L., Autio E. 2020. Innovation ecosystems in management: An organizing typology. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press.

Thomas L., Ritala P., Karhu K., Heiskala M. 2024. Vertical and horizontal complementarities in platform ecosystems. Innovation.

Treiber M., Theunissen T., Grebner S., Witting J., Bernhardt H. 2023. How to Successfully Orchestrate Content for Digital Agriecosystems. Agriculture, 13: 1003.

References

Ezangina I.A., Malovichko A.E., Khryseva A.A. 2023. Innovacionnaya e`kosistema kak novaya forma organizacionnoj celostnosti i mexanizm finansirovaniya i vosproizvodstva innovacij. [Innovation ecosystem as a new form of organizational integrity and a mechanism for financing and reproducing innovations]. Finansy`: teoriya i praktika, 27 (3): 17–32.

Korobaynikov D.A. 2024. Razvitie e`kosistemny`x form realizacii kreditny`x otnoshenij v APK [Development of ecosystem forms of implementing credit relations in the agro-industrial complex]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: E`konomika, 59 (2): 95–111.

Korobaynikova O.M., Ocheretyanaya D.V., Peters I.A., Shaldokhina S.Yu. 2022. Cifrovy`e e`kosistemy` dlya agrobiznesa [Digital ecosystems for agribusiness]. Agrarnaya Rossiya, 6: 40–47.

Medennikov V.I. 2021. Cifrovaya ontologicheskaya integraciya bazovy`x cifrovy`x platform v e`kosisteme APK [Digital ontological integration of basic digital platforms in the agro-industrial complex ecosystem]. Upravlenie riskami v APK, 38: 7–20.

Ramenskaya L.A. 2020. Primenenie koncepcii e`kosistem v e`konomiko-upravlencheskix issledovaniyax [Application of the ecosystem concept in economic and managerial research]. Upravlenecz, 11 (4): 16–28.

Stepnov I.M., Kovalchuk Yu.A. 2023. Finansy` biznes-e`kosistem: sovremennaya povestka i vy`zovy` [Finance of business ecosystems: current agenda and challenges]. Finansy`: teoriya i praktika, 27 (6): 89–100.

Shastitko A.E., Kurdin A.A., Filippova I.N. 2023. Mezoinstituty` dlya cifrovy`x e`kosistem [Mesoinstitutions for digital ecosystems]. Voprosy` e`konomiki, 2: 61–82.

Carliss Y. 2020. Baldwin Ecosystems and Complementarities. Design Rules, How Technology Shapes Organizations. Working Paper, 5 (2): 21–33.

Foss N., Schmidt J., Teece D. 2022. Ecosystem Leadership as a Dynamic Capability. Long Range Planning, 56 (1): 102270.

Gawer A. 2021. Digital platforms and ecosystems: remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Innovation, 24: 1–15.

Jacobides M., Lianos I. 2021. Regulating platforms and ecosystems: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(1).

Koch M., Krohmer D., Naab M., Rost D., Trapp M. 2022. A matter of definition: Criteria for digital ecosystems. Digit. Bus, 2: 100027.

Korobeynikova O., Korobeynikov D., Popova L., Chekrygina T., Melikhov V. 2023. Russian agribusiness and digital ecosystems: ways of interaction. XV International Scientific Conference «INTERAGROMASH 2022»: Proceedings, volume 1, Rostovon-Don, May 25-27, 2022. Cham: Springer: 1205–1215.

Kretschmer T., Leiponen A., Schilling M., Vasudeva G. 2020. Platform ecosystems as meta‐organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 43 (5): 1–20.

Rietveld J., Ploog J.N., Nieborg D.B. 2020. Coevolution of platform dominance and governance strategies: Effects on complementor performance outcomes. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6 (3): 488–513.

Rietveld J., Schilling M.A. 2021. Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. Journal of Management, 47 (6): 1528–1563.

Silva L., Gomes L., Faria A., Borini F. 2024. Innovation processes in ecosystem settings: An integrative framework and future directions. Technovation, 132.

Thomas L., Autio E. 2020. Innovation ecosystems in management: An organizing typology. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press.

Thomas L., Ritala P., Karhu K., Heiskala M. 2024. Vertical and horizontal complementarities in platform ecosystems. Innovation.

Treiber M., Theunissen T., Grebner S., Witting J., Bernhardt H. 2023. How to Successfully Orchestrate Content for Digital Agriecosystems. Agriculture, 13: 1003.


Abstract views: 0

Share

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Korobeynikov, D. A., Korabelnikov, I. S., & Telekabel, V. K. (2026). Principles and Models for the Development of Equidistant Digital Infrastructure in the Agro-Industrial Complex: the research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 24-28-01117 "Development of an ecosystem model of the functioning of agricultural credit", https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-01117/. Economics. Information Technologies, 53(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2026-53-1-65-73

Issue

Section

SECTORAL MARKETS AND MARKET INFRASTRUCTURE