Model of Functioning of Knowledge-Intensive Local Market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2025-52-1-31-40Keywords:
knowledge-intensive local market, model of a knowledge-intensive local market, innovative ecosystem, innovative infrastructure, intellectual productAbstract
The article presents brief results of the study into the efficiency of the main elements of the local knowledge-intensive market, the economic agents of which are advanced scientific schools, innovation-active companies, specialized centers of innovation infrastructure, and other elements. The hypothesis of the study was the assumption that the structural and institutional changes occurring in the economic system of the country affect all segments of the national market, and first of all, the knowledge-intensive one. Apart from the traditional resources (material and human), this segment involves intellectual assets. Their promotion requires stable interaction of all elements of the market system. The aim of the study was to build a model of a knowledge-intensive local market. The object of the study was the knowledge-intensive market of the Belgorod region. The research methods included a content analysis of scientific publications in the Google Scholar search engine and the analysis of statistical data of the Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Belgorod Region. The research result allows forming a theoretical model of the functioning of a knowledge-intensive local market, the constituent elements of which are: an innovative ecosystem, an innovative infrastructure, a knowledge-intensive high-tech local market and intellectual products that constitute part of the innovation cycle and the value chain for promoting research-and-development products in the market. Individual parameters of the model were analyzed based on the existing parameters for the region’s knowledge-intensive market.
Downloads
References
Список источников
Поисковая система по научным публикациям Google Scholar URL: https://scholar.google.ru/schhp?hl=ru (дата обращения: 25.04.2024)
Передовые производственные технологии, наука и инновации в экономике Белгородской области в 2023 году: Аналитический материал / Белгородстат – 2024 г. – 72 с.
Приказ Министерства промышленности и торговли РФ от 17 февраля 2020 г. N 521 «Об утверждении критериев отнесения товаров, работ и услуг к инновационной продукции и (или) высокотехнологичной продукции для целей формирования плана закупки такой продукции по отраслям, относящимся к установленной сфере деятельности Министерства промышленности и торговли Российской Федерации» // Информационно-правовой портал «Гарант.ру». URL: https://base.garant.ru/73791873/(дата обращения: 10.12.2024).
References
Adner R. 2006. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84 (4): 98–107. PMID: 16579417
Andersson D., Berger T., Prawitz E. 2023. Making a market: Infrastructure, integration, and the rise of innovation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 105 (2): 258–274. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3540253
Antonelli C., Orsatti G., Pialli G. 2023. The knowledge-intensive direction of technological change. Eurasian Business Review, 13: 1–27. DOI: 10.1007/s40821-022-00234-z
Cennamo C. 2021. Competing in digital markets: a platform-based perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35 (2): 265–291. DOI: 10.5465/amp.2016.0048
Dedehayir O., Mäkinen S.J., Ortt J.R. 2018. Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136: 18–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028
Domanski D., Howaldt J., Kaletka C. 2020. A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures. European Planning Studies, 28 (3): 454–474.
Eskindarov M.A. et al., 2020. Human capital competencies in high-tech and knowledge-intensive sectors of the economy. Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny, 13 (6): 199–214. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.6.72.12
Granstrand O., Holgersson M. 2020. Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90: 102098. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
Jackson D.J. 2011. What is an innovation ecosystem? National science foundation, 1 (2): 1–13.
Karagouni G. 2018. Production technologies and low-technology knowledge-intensive venturing. EuroMed Journal of Business, 13 (2): 1–11. DOI: 10.1108/EMJB-11-2016-0033
Kong Q. et al. 2021. High-technology development zones and innovation in knowledge-intensive service firms: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 78: 101883. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101883
Kusiak A. 2018. Smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 56 (1-2): 508–517. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644
Nipa T.J., Kermanshachi S., Subramanya K. 2022. Development of Innovative Strategies to Enhance the Resilience of the Critical Infrastructure. Construction Research Congress 2022: 111–120. DOI: 10.1061/9780784483954.012
Oh D.S. et al. 2016. Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54: 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
Sohn K., Kwon O. 2020. Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial Intelligence-based intelligent products. Telematics and Informatics, 47: 101324. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101324
Terziev V., Klimuk V. 2021. Development of R&D and innovation infrastructure of China and Belarus. Conference: 73rd International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – «Sustainable Tourism in Post-pandemic World» – Dubrovnik.
Wang C.H., Chang C.H., Lee Z.C.R. 2022. Business-to-business platform ecosystem practices and their impacts on firm performance: evidence from high-tech manufacturing firms. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33 (5): 1005–1016. DOI: 10.1108/ IJOPM.07.2021.0253
Zheng P. et al. 2018. A systematic design approach for service innovation of smart product-service systems. Journal of cleaner production, 201: 657–667. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.101
Zheng P. et al. 2018. Smart manufacturing systems for Industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 13: 137–150. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-018-0499-5
Zheng P. et al. 2019. A survey of smart product-service systems: Key aspects, challenges and future perspectives. Advanced engineering informatics, 42: 100973. DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2019.100973
Abstract views: 22
Share
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Economics. Information Technologies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.