Typology of Regional Trajectories for Achieving National Development Goals in Russia

Authors

  • Viktor I. Blanutsa V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2023-50-1-5-17

Keywords:

socio-economic development, region, target indicator, trend, cluster analysis, dendrogram, spatial autocorrelation, Russian Federation

Abstract

The aim of the study is to identify groups of Russian regions with different types of trajectories for achieving national development goals for each indicator and for the entire set of indicators. The initial data are taken from the annex to the government document “Unified Plan for Achieving the National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2024 and for the Planning Period up to 2030”. According to the features of the trajectories of achieving indicators in the region, ascending, descending and sideways trends are determined. A measure of the distance between regions in the multidimensional space of all indicators is proposed. Using the author's algorithm for grouping regions, two types of multidimensional trajectory have been identified. The distribution of regions into two types has formed a specific territorial structure in the form of a western and eastern zone of the second type, separated by a space of the first type and partially outlined by fragments of this space along the state border of Russia. The problem regions are identified and the features of spatial autocorrelation of regions are determined. The types of regional trajectories allow us to assess the future heterogeneity of the Russian socio-economic space, which will be formed as a result of the implementation of national development goals by 2030. The results obtained can be used to adjust national goals and monitor the implementation of the schedule for achieving the goals. Seven directions of further research are proposed.

 

Acknowledgements
The study was carried out at the expense of the state task (topic registration No. AAAA21-121012190018-2).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Viktor I. Blanutsa, V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Geographical Sciences, RAS expert in Economic Sciences, Leading Researcher at the Laboratory of Geo-Resource Studies and Political Geography.

References

Распоряжение Правительства Российской Федерации от 1 октября 2021 г. № 2765-р «Об утверждении Единого плана по достижению национальных целей развития Российской Федерации на период до 2024 года и на плановый период до 2030 года». URL: https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/file/ffccd6ed40dbd803eedd11bc8c9f7571/Plan_po_dostizheniyu_nacionalnyh_celey_razvitiya_do_2024g.pdf (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).

Блануца В.И. 2022. Кластеризация регионов Сибири и Дальнего Востока по достижению национальных целей развития. Российский экономический журнал, 3: 63–83.

Бородина Т.Л. 2004. Типология трендов динамики населения регионов России (1959–2002 гг.). Известия РАН. Серия географическая, 6: 67–79.

Винокуров Г.Н., Ковалев В.И., Малков С.Ю. 2014. Геополитическая траектория государства: моделирование и прогноз. В кн.: Мировая динамика: закономерности, тенденции, прогноз / Отв. ред. А.А. Акаев, А.В. Коротаев, С.Ю. Малков. Москва, КРАСАНД: 462–474.

Головин А.А. 2022. Моделирование качества развития жизни населения регионов. Вестник университета, 4: 90–99.

Гуня А.Н. 2005. Региональные тренды и развитие природно-хозяйственных систем. Известия РАН. Серия географическая, 3: 11–21.

Мэрфи Дж. Дж. 2011. Технический анализ фьючерсных рынков: теория и практика / Пер с англ. Москва, Альпина Паблишер, 610 с.

Alaimo L.S., Maggino F. 2020. Sustainable development goals indicator at territorial level: Conceptual and methodological issues – The Italian perspective. Social Indicators Research, 147: 383–419.

Anselin D. 1995. Local Indicators of Spatial Association – LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27 (2): 93–115.

Barrios C., Flores E., Angeles M.M. 2019. Club convergence in innovation activity across European regions. Papers in Regional Science, 98 (4): 1545–1565.

Benedek J., Ivan K., Török I., Temerdek A., Holobâcâ I.-H. 2021. Indicator-based assessment of local and regional progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): An integrated approach from Romania. Sustainable Development, 29 (5): 860–875.

Blanutsa V.I. 2021. Dendrograms in regional socio-economic analysis: Interpretation and verification. Scientific Visualization, 13 (5): 1–15.

Bonnet J., Coll-Martínez E., Renou-Maissant P. 2021. Evaluating sustainable development by composite index: Evidence from French departments. Sustainability, 13 (2): 1–23.

Cling J.-P., Eghbal-Teherani S., Orzoni M., Plateau C. 2020. The interlinkages between the SDG indicators and the differentiation between EU countries: It is (mainly) the economy. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 36: 455–470.

Gennari P., D’Orazio M. 2020. A statistical approach for assessing progress toward the SDG targets. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 36: 1129–1142.

Gozgor G., Lau C.K.M., Lu Z. 2019. Convergence clustering in the Chinese provinces: New evidence from several macroeconomic indicators. Review of Development Economics, 23 (3): 1331–1346.

Linnerud K., Holden E., Simonsen M. 2021. Closing the sustainable development gap: A global study of goal interactions. Sustainable Development, 29 (4): 738–753.

Lutz S.U. 2019. The European digital single market strategy: Local indicators of spatial association 2011–2016. Telecommunications Policy, 43 (5): 393–410.

Qiu W., Meng F., Wang Y., Fu G., He J., Savic D., Zhao H. 2018. Assessing spatial and temporal variations in regional sustainability in mainland China from 2004 to 2014. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 20: 1185–1194.

Shaker R.R. 2015. The spatial distribution of development in Europe and its underlying sustainability correlations. Applied Geography, 63: 304–314.

Truong V.C. 2021. Multivariate classification of provinces of Vietnam according to the level of sustainable development. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 51: 109–122.

Vaziri M., Acheampong M., Downs J., Mohammad R.M. 2019. Poverty as a function of space: Understanding the spatial configuration of poverty in Malaysia for Sustainable Development Goal number one. GeoJournal, 84: 1317–1336.

Wang L., Wu C., Zhao X., Liu D., Zhang T. 2021. Spatio-temporal characteristics of regional sustainable economic growth drivers of China. Regional Sustainability, 2 (3): 239–255.


Abstract views: 55

Share

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Blanutsa, V. I. (2023). Typology of Regional Trajectories for Achieving National Development Goals in Russia. Economics. Information Technologies, 50(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2023-50-1-5-17

Issue

Section

REGIONAL AND MUNICIPAL ECONOMY