Research of Foreign Methodological Approaches to the Assessment of Human Capital

Authors

  • Anna M. Kulik Belgorod National Research University
  • Natalija A. Gerasimova Belgorod National Research University
  • Anna N. Kogteva Academy of Labor and Social Relations

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2022-49-3-483-493

Keywords:

human capital, assessment methodology, components of human capital assessment methodology, human capital assessment indices, employee individual value model

Abstract

This article presents a study of foreign methodological approaches to the assessment of human capital. The approach to the assessment of human capital by the American researcher G. Becker is considered; the classification of methods for assessing human capital from the point of view of the Lithuanian politician A. Sakalas is demonstrated. The research of J. Fitz-ents, who proposed a simple model with a flexible tool for assessing human capital, is noted. In addition to the above, the paper provides a detailed comparative description of the categories of human capital assessment based on the expert in the field of knowledge management Karl-Eric Swaby. The presented methods make it possible to determine positions on individual indicators that characterize the level of human capital development. The studied set of methods for assessing human capital from the point of view of foreign experience does not fully disclose the application of modern factors affecting the formation and development of human capital. A methodological approach to grouping regions for compliance with the indicators of the conditions of spatial distribution of human capital is presented.

 

Acknowledgements
The research was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of NRU BelSU FZWG-2020-0016 (0624-2020-0016), the topic of the project "Fundamental foundations of global territorial and industry specialization in the context of digitalization and technology convergence".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Anna M. Kulik, Belgorod National Research University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Applied Economics and Economic Security, Belgorod National Research University,
Belgorod, Russia

Natalija A. Gerasimova, Belgorod National Research University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Applied Economics and Economic Security, Belgorod National Research University,
Belgorod, Russia

Anna N. Kogteva, Academy of Labor and Social Relations

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Management, Academy of Labor and Social Relations,
Moscow, Russia

References

Авакян А.Г. 2015. Методы оценки стоимости человеческого капитала за рубежом. Современные тенденции в экономике и управлении: новый взгляд, 33: 158–160.

Васильева Е. 2010. Анализ методологических подходов к измерению человеческого капитала. Федерализм, 1: 89–96.

Добрынин А.И., Дятлов С.А., Цыренова Е.Д. 1999. Человеческий капитал в транзитивной экономике: формирование, оценка, эффективность использования. СПб.: Наука, 308 с.

Кирьянов Д.А., Сухарева Т.Н. 2011. Методы оценки человеческого капитала: анализ объективности и достаточности исходных данных. Теория и практика общественного развития, 3: 337–340.

Кондаурова И.А. 2016. Идентификация проблем формирования и использования человеческого капитала в контексте инновационного развития. Друкеровский вестник, 3: 212–213.

Корчагин Ю.А. 2016. Человеческий капитал как фактор роста и развития или стагнации, рецессии и деградации: Монография. Воронеж: ЦИРЭ, 51 с.

Краковская И.Н. 2008. Измерение и оценка человеческого капитала организации: подходы и проблемы. Экономический анализ: теория и практика, 19(124): 14–50.

Кристиневич С.А. 2015. Эффективность развития человеческого капитала: теоретико-методический аспект. Экономический вестник университета. Сборник научных трудов ученых и аспирантов, 25-1: 117–121.

Кузьмичева И.А., Флик Е.Г. 2012. Становление оценки и оценочной деятельности в мире и в России. Территория новых возможностей. Вестник Владивостокского государственного университета экономики и сервиса, 2: 119–123.

Ришко Ю.Б. 2014. Методы оценки человеческого капитала в организации. Вестник Омского государственного аграрного университета, 4: 71–78.

Самусенко С.А. 2015. Финансовая оценка человеческого капитала организации, 3: 138–142.

Соболева И.В. 2009. Парадоксы измерения человеческого капитала. Научный доклад. Москва: Институт экономики РАН. 50 с.

Спиридонова Е.М. 2010. Индекс развития человеческого потенциала как интегральный показатель уровня жизни населения регионов. Вестник СамГУПС, 4: 45–51.

Allan, M. Williams, Vladimir, Baláz, Claire, Wallace. 2004. International Labour Mobility and Uneven Regional Development in Europe: Human Capital, Knowledge and Entrepreneurship. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(1): 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776404039140

Crespo C., Doppelhofer G., Huber F., Piribauer P. 2018. Human capital accumulation and long-term income growth projections for European regions. Journal of Regional Science, 58: 81–99.

Diebolt, C., Hippe, R. 2019. The long-run impact of human capital on innovation and economic development in the regions of Europe. Applied Economics, 51(5): 542–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018. 1495820

Dung, N.T., Tri, N.M., & Minh, L.N. 2021. Digital transformation meets national development requirements. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2): 892–905. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1536

Flores, E., Xu, X. and Lu, Y. 2020. Human Capital 4.0: a workforce competence typology for Industry 4.0, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(4): 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2019-0309

Flores, E., Xu, X. and Lu, Y. 2020. Human Capital 4.0: a workforce competence typology for Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31: 687–703.

Kogteva, A.N., Gerasimova, N.A., Kulik, A.M., Drughnikova E.P., Ibragimov, M. 2020. Features of the Formation and Development of the Region’s Human Capital in a Digital Transformation. International Conference on Economics, Management and Technologies 2020 (ICEMT 2020). Atlantis Press: 44–49.

Marcel, Matthess, Stefanie, Kunkel. 2020. Structural change and digitalization in developing countries: Conceptually linking the two transformations. Technology in Society, 63 (1): 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101428.

Matthias, Flückiger, Markus, Ludwig. 2018. Geography, human capital and urbanization: A regional analysis. Economics Letters, 168: 10-14.

Patrikakis, C.Z., Murugesan, S. 2020. The New Needs of Professions in IT. Professional, 22(1): 43–46. https:// doi: 10.1109/MITP.2019.2963413.

Schulz T.W. 1971. Investment in Human Capital: The Role of Education and of Rearch. FreePress, 1: 64–65.

Svarc, J., Laznjak, J. and Dabic, M. 2021. The role of national intellectual capital in the digital transformation of EU countries. Another digital divide? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(4): 768–791. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2020-0024


Abstract views: 274

Share

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Kulik, A. M., Gerasimova, N. A., & Kogteva, A. N. (2022). Research of Foreign Methodological Approaches to the Assessment of Human Capital. Economics. Information Technologies, 49(3), 483-493. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2022-49-3-483-493

Issue

Section

INVESTMENT AND INNOVATIONS

Most read articles by the same author(s)