The Problem of Identifying the Product Boundaries of the Industrial Sector Market in OKVED: an Empirical Approach

Authors

  • Natalya Yu. Yaroshevich Ural State University of Economics
  • Vasily B. Migunov Ural State University of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2022-49-2-308-326

Keywords:

industry market, OECD, empirical study, industrial products, product boundaries

Abstract

The article deals with the identification of the product boundaries of the industrial market within the OKVED classifier. The methodological basis of the study was the provisions of sectoral market theory in terms of the definition of the sectoral market and the normative approach in terms of comparing methods for defining its product boundaries. The relevance of developing methodological tools for determining the product boundaries of the sectoral market in the context of the OKVED classifier has been substantiated. The proposed method is an implementation of three sequential steps basic on simple comparisons of the total gross revenues of the enterprises forming the appropriate level (subclass, group) of the classifier. The methodology is being tested with 10 OKVED Group C codes "Manufacturing" as an example. The results of the empirical part of the study enabled the product boundaries of the 19 industrial sector markets to be defined quite precisely. The resulting product boundaries correspond to the features of technological differentiation and product mix within the codes in question. The use of the methodology allows the product boundaries of industry markets to be defined quickly, inexpensively and, in most cases, unambiguously within the OKVED classifier. The proposed approach is universal and can also be used to define the product boundaries of the sectoral market within other classes (subclasses and groups) of the activity classifier.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Natalya Yu. Yaroshevich, Ural State University of Economics

Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Associate Prof., Associate Prof. of Enterprises Economics Dept, Ural State University of Economics,
Yekaterinburg, Russia

Vasily B. Migunov, Ural State University of Economics

Ural State University of Economics,
Yekaterinburg, Russia

References

Авдашева, С.Б., Голованова С.В., Крючкова П.В., Кудряшова Е.Н., Мелешкина А.И., Сухорукова, К.А., Шаститко А.Е. 2018. Антимонопольная политика на связанных рынках: теория и практика. Москва: Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС, 440 с.

Авдашева С.Б., Юсупова Г.Ф. 2021. Экономический анализ границ фирмы и ограничений конкуренции: случай консорциума «Северный поток-2». Вопросы экономики, 10: 134–151.

Алейникова И.С., Евтюхов С.А., Лукьянов С.А. 2011. Входные барьеры как важнейшая динамическая характеристика современных рынков: подходы различных школ к определению. Современная конкуренция, 2: 40–46.

Минцберг Г. 2019. Менеджмент: природа и структура организаций. Litres.

Орехова С.В., Кислицын Е.В. 2019. Совокупная производительность факторов в промышленности России: малые vs крупные предприятия. Journal of new economy, 20(2): 127–144.

Орехова С.В., Ярошевич Н.Ю. 2017. Институциональная организация отраслевых рынков: теория, методика и эмпирический анализ. Научные ведомости БелГУ. Сер. Экономика. Информатика, 16 (265): 60–74.

Портер М. 2005. Конкурентная стратегия: Методика анализа отраслей и конкурентов. М.: Альпина Бизнес Букс, 454 с.

Розанова Н.М. 2021. Методологические проблемы современной антимонопольной полити-ки. Проблемы прогнозирования, 5: 64–73.

Рой Л.В., Третьяк В.Н. 2008. Анализ отраслевых рынков. Учебное пособие. М., ИНФРА-М. 442c.

Чугуев А.М. 2012. Отраслевой рынок: определения, структура, показатели. Университетские чтения. Пятигорский государственный лингвистический университет: 12–16.

Шаститко А.Е., Паршина Е.Н. 2016. Рынки с двусторонними сетевыми эффектами: спецификация предметной области. Современная конкуренция, 10(1(55)): 5–18.

Штапова И.С. 2009. Понятие отраслевого рынка и его когнитивное представление. Экономические науки, 5: 185–190.

Abell D.E. 1980. Defining the Business: The Starting point of Strategic Planning. Englewood Cliffs. 320 p.

Ahmad, A.A., Habibah, S.N. 2021. Market Structure and Determinants of Firm Profitability on General Insurance Industry in Indonesia. Studies in Business and Economics, 16(1): 26–41. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2021-0003

Boyd, T. 2014. Property Market Analysis: The key to looking forward. In Proceedings of the PRRES Conference 2014. University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland.

Brooks G.R. 1995. Defining market boundaries. Strategic Management Journal, 16(7): 535–549.

Bustamante M. C., Donangelo A. 2017. Product market competition and industry returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(12): 4216-4266. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx033

Digal L.N., Ahmadi–Esfahani, F.Z. 2002. Market power analysis in the retail food industry: a survey of methods. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 46(4): 559–584.

Dobbs, I. 2002. The assessment of market power and market boundaries using the hypothetical monopoly test. Department of Accounting and Finance, and Newcastle School of Management, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.

Gaynor M. S., Kleiner S.A., Vogt W. B. 2013. A Structural Approach to Market Definition With an Application to the Hospital Industry, Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, 61(2): 243–289

Gual J. 2003. Market Definition in the Telecoms Industry. CEPR Discussion Papers 3988, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

Howard S., Howard S., & Howard S. 2020. Quantitative market analysis of the European Climate Services sector -The application of the kMatrix big data market analytical tool to provide robust market intelligence. Climate Services, 17, 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2019.100108

Kim J.H., Jung Y.L., Yoo, H.S. 2018. Design and implementation of “One-click” Industry Market Analysis System. Proceedings of the Korean Contents Association ICCC: 201–202.

Li, X. 2019. Global market and income gaps between industries: evidence from finance industry and manufacturing industry. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 6(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-019-0103-3

Mason E.S. 1939 Price and Production Policies of Lange Scale Еenterprise // American Economic Review, 29: 61–74.

Nightinglale J. 2003.On the Definition of “Industrial” and “Market” Journal of Industrial Economics, 1(27): 31–40

Pashkov S. 2021. Video game industry market analysis: Approaches that resulted in industry success and high demand.

Robinson J. 1933. The Economics of Imperfect Competition.London: Macmillan.

Sherer F.M. Ross D. 1991. Industrial market stricture and economic performance. 3d ed. Boston: Houghton Miffin Co.: 715p.

Slater S.F., Olson E.M. 2002. A fresh look at industry and market analysis. Business Horizons, 45(1): 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(02)80005-2


Abstract views: 145

Share

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Yaroshevich, N. Y., & Migunov, V. B. (2022). The Problem of Identifying the Product Boundaries of the Industrial Sector Market in OKVED: an Empirical Approach. Economics. Information Technologies, 49(2), 308-326. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2022-49-2-308-326

Issue

Section

SECTORAL MARKETS AND MARKET INFRASTRUCTURE