The Empirical Research of Environmental Protection Significance in the Republic of Serbia

Authors

  • Filip B. Cvetković University „Union Nikola Tesla“; Faculty of Applied Sciences
  • Aleksandar Z. Stanković University „Business Academy “, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management
  • Jasmina Gligorijević University „Union Nikola Tesla“; Faculty of Applied Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2022-49-2-268-276

Keywords:

environmental research, environmental protect, standards, Republic of Serbia

Abstract

Protection and promotion of quality of the environment concerns everyone, from the individual to the global level. This process must include all the countries in the world and all the entities within those countries. With a view to having businesses contributing to environmental protection, in recent years, there have been discussions on ecological management within companies. Numerous standards and management systems defined at local, regional, and international levels are adding to the growing impact of ecological management. The environment is one of the key issues within the European Union where the EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) system and the group of standards ISO 14000 relating to the environment and companies’ relationship to it were defined. Unlike the EMAS system, which is binding to members of the EU, ISO standards are not, but most businesses in the EU implement them in their operations. Companies in RS, resulting from cooperation with EU companies, frequently choose to implement these standards, likewise, to facilitate cooperation with foreign businesses which frequently demand the implementation of these standards. To ascertain how much importance domestic companies place on environmental management and protection this research contains a survey through which the respondents indicate that they do not have much faith in the attitudes of domestic businesses towards the environment. For this reason, it is necessary to make advancements in this area in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Filip B. Cvetković, University „Union Nikola Tesla“; Faculty of Applied Sciences

M.Sc., Assistant, University „Union Nikola Tesla“, Belgrade, Serbia, Faculty of Applied Sciences,
Nis, Serbia

Aleksandar Z. Stanković, University „Business Academy “, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management

Doc.Sc., Docent, University „Business Academy“, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management,
Novi Sad, Serbia

Jasmina Gligorijević, University „Union Nikola Tesla“; Faculty of Applied Sciences

Ph.D., Professor, University „Union Nikola Tesla“,
Belgrade, Serbia;

Faculty of Applied Sciences,
Nis, Serbia

References

Adams K.A., Lawrence E.K. 2015. Research Methods, Statistics and Applications, SAGE Publications, London, United Kingdom, 672 p.

Elizabeth Delaney, Barbara Thomson. 2013. Environmental Management System Development Process. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/22588.

Europian Environmental Agency. 2005. Market-based instruments for environmental policy in Europe, Tehnical report, Copenhagen, 155 pp.

Jackson Suzan. 1997. The ISO 14001 Implementation Guide: Creating an Integrated Management System, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 304 p.

SIQ – Slovenian Institute of Quality and Metrology. URL: https://www.siq.si/sr/usluge/sertifikacija-sistema-menadzmenta/usluge/zivotna-sredina-i-energija/sistem-menadzmenta-zastitom-zivotne-sredine/ (date of access 10.04.2022).

Verbeek M. 2008. A Guide to Modern Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 446 p.

Wenk Michael. 2006. The European Union's Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS), Springer, Berlin, 275p.

El-Gayar, Omar and Fritz, Brian D. 2006. Environmental Management Information Systems (EMIS) for Sustainable Development: A Conceptual Overview. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 34. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol17/iss1/34

Paul de Backer. 1996. Umweltmanagement im Unternehmen. Springer, Berlin, 252 p.

Sena da Silva, G.C. and Dumke de Medeiros, D. 2004. Environmental management in Brazilian companies. Management of Environmental Quality, 15(4): 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830410540126

Singh Mitrabinda, Brueckner Martin, Prasanta Padhy Martin. 2015. Environmental Management System ISO 14001: Effective waste minimisation in small and medium enterprises in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.028

Stojanović, M., Đorđrvić, M. 2016. The role of environmental taxes in Serbian tax system. Ekonomika, Niš, 4: 75–85.

Sudath Weerasiri, Zhang Zhengang. 2012. Attitudes and Awareness towards Environmental Management and its Impact on Environmental Management Practices (EMPs) of SMEs in Sri Lanka. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 3(1): 16–23. DOI: 10.22610/jsds.v3i1.681

Zeng Liang, Proctor Robert W., Salvendy Gavriel. 2011. Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests Be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1): 24–37. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2011.545713


Abstract views: 72

Share

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Cvetković, F. B., Stanković, A. Z., & Gligorijević, J. (2022). The Empirical Research of Environmental Protection Significance in the Republic of Serbia. Economics. Information Technologies, 49(2), 268-276. https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2022-49-2-268-276

Issue

Section

INVESTMENT AND INNOVATIONS

Most read articles by the same author(s)